Announcing Postman for the Web, Now in Open Beta

Proxies are always suspect, but think there is more we can do before we say that. Watch this, and see if there are any steps that help you.

Then Iā€™d head over to support and see how they can help you out. Sorry you are having so much trouble getting going.

1 Like

I was able to access the Postman Agent running on other machines. This can be done by making a user with Postman agent visit a malicious website. The website can then make requests from the userā€™s postman agent. This can be used to make bulk requests from the userā€™s machine without the userā€™s knowledge.

If you want to discuss this, you can DM me on twitter @jojimail

Can I get you to submit a ticket explaining, so we can address? - https://support.getpostman.com

Hi,
I would love to, but that is not an option on an Ipad pro.

Iā€™m a bit confused, if Iā€™m using Postman app (for Mac) what is the benefit of using Postman in the browser + Postman agent?

Postman for mac is great for you and how you develop or consume APIs in isolation, but the web edition would give you a URL for each collection, or down to individual requests that can be run within a well defined workspace, with accompanying environment (auth, etc0), that anyone can runā€“complete with RBAC. It just cascades from there with URLs for runners, monitors, scripts, environments, etc. You have a URL to your entire API lifecycle, across all APIs, across teams.

  • May we know the roadmap for the Postman desktop version? Does it mean weā€™re getting a lesser priority in terms of bugs/new features development since the web version is coming?
  • I would love to see debugging improvements (eg. Having the ability to put breakpoints for Test scripts and not relying solely on console.logs
  • For a personal perspective, Iā€™d rather install Postman desktop version rather than downloading an 80mb+ that acts as a local server, unless thereā€™s a very persuading reason to migrate to Postman web.
  • I think having the ability to create a Postman snippet (dynamic link) for simple API requests would be a fantastic feature (JSFiddle-like playground - shareable snippets for those who arenā€™t using Postman)

EDIT: Added last bullet

Hi there, is there any way to see requests logs on Postman Agent?
or that feature havenā€™t implemented yet?

I think it would be great if I can monitor the requests form postman agent window or just tail -f :smiley:

May we know the roadmap for the Postman desktop version? Does it mean weā€™re getting a lesser priority in terms of bugs/new features development since the web version is coming?

Kin Lane - There is no plan to demote or diminish the desktop version. The web, desktop, and API are equal priorities ā€“ here is the road map.

I would love to see debugging improvements (eg. Having the ability to put breakpoints for Test scripts and not relying solely on console.logs

Kin Lane - I recommend you submitting that as a GitHub issue.

For a personal perspective, Iā€™d rather install Postman desktop version rather than downloading an 80mb+ that acts as a local server, unless thereā€™s a very persuading reason to migrate to Postman web.

Kin Lane - It is our challenge to convince you otherwise. Really it comes down to whether you do API in isolation, or you do APIs in a collaborative way.

I think having the ability to create a Postman snippet (dynamic link) for simple API requests would be a fantastic feature (JSFiddle-like playground - shareable snippets for those who arenā€™t using Postman)

Kin Lane - I recommend you submitting that as a GitHub issue.

Kin Lane - Currently no - I recommend you submitting that as a GitHub issue.

Ah, I was hoping this would be a solution for me on my Chromebook that doesnā€™t support Crostini, but unfortunately that doesnā€™t seem the case, as thereā€™s no way to install the Desktop Agent to work around the CORS issue, right?

@mariomenti unless the architecture changes a bit, this is not possible. The agent works only on Windows, macOS and Linux.

I have tried the Postman for the web and here are some ideas (this is just a first look at this new product/idea):

Main ideas:

  • works almost as good as the Postman App, but there is no compelling reason to switch, not right now
  • this approach has potential, with so many apps being browser-based nowadays
  • for most use-cases you still need to install the Postman Agent
  • does not work from any browser, you are forced to use Windows, macOS, Linux

Ideas on how this can be improved

  • provide a ā€œcloudā€ agent to run the requests (privacy issues?, wonā€™t work for localhost requests)
  • allow an organization/user to define its own agent IP address (can help with many of the proxy issues that many users experience)
  • does not work from a phone or a tablet, as you cannot yet install an agent

Honestly, I did not actually understand the part with how the Postman for the web helps with collaboration. I understand that this has potential but many current users may have other priorities right now.

Slightly off-topic, but I have noticed that there might be a disconnect between the Postman roadmap and the more acute pain points that some users have (not saying that the roadmap is not addressing other issues).

Take for example, what @chlkdst mentioned regarding debugging requests. While debugging requests with the console was okay 2-3 years ago, there is no effort or roadmap for addressing this aspect (or I did not notice it).

4 Likes

thanks, yes thatā€™s what I suspectedā€¦

@postman-harryi3t

Pretty niceā€¦ Canā€™t wait to try it out.

Can HTTPS request made through Postman Agent?
I installed the server side trust certificate as specified by Chrome, yet Agent returns the following error:

That is Awesome!
This update is great experience for me.

However, I have noticed that i can not use by my iPad browser.
Is this Postman for the web connecting to localhost Postman Agent?
I thought that Postman Agent was tied to my Postman account.

As @vdespa said, It would be great if the Cloud Agent was offered.

We have it disabled for the early beta to reduce challenges with certificates ā€“ just looking to get feedback on core functionality currently, but will be turning on encryption soon.

In the road map already! Keep eyes peeled.

4 Likes